Skip to content

No GMA in Federal System?

“(T)here is the problem of the federal system being a more expensive form of government. Where will the country find the money for another layer of officials and governance? More taxes is where.”

by Ducky Paredes

 

I find simplistic the latest explanation by Senate minority leader Aquilino “Nene” Pimentel yesterday that his proposed federal system of government will not allow any extension to the term of President Arroyo.

“That will not happen because it is clear in my proposal that the term of the incumbent president will not be extended. Even my term as senator will be terminated in 2010,” he said.

In fact, he points out that Article 19 of his proposed federal Constitution provides: “Unless the incumbent president is removed from office, dies or resigns, the incumbent shall serve until 2010, the year her Constitutional term of office ends. She is however not qualified to run again under the Constitution.”

This was apparently written precisely for Gloria since it uses the feminine pronoun. What if Noli de Castro become president before 2010?

Besides, with all of his good intentions, a constituent assembly will not have to follow the wishes of any senator since there will be more congressmen in attendance. Since Gloria control the Lower House, she will certainly have her way with the constituent assembly.

And then there is the problem of the federal system being a more expensive form of government. Where will the country find the money for another layer of officials and governance? More taxes is where.

* * *

We have letters: “If it’s a consolation, the Philippines is not alone in its misery insofar as soaring gas prices are concerned. I’ve learned that the price of  premium gasoline there has already breached the P50/liter mark, and there is no relief in sight.  If it is a “consuelo de bobo”  for us Filipinos, price of premium gas in most  parts of the USA has already breached the $4/gallon mark. And with the spiraling cost of crude oil in the world market, the spectre of  much higher fuel price looms large.

 “If you think that  theft of gasoline from  parked or unguarded vehicles can only happen in the Philippines, it is not so anymore.  There have been reports of fuel stolen or siphoned from parked vehicles here. One particularly eye-opening incident happened in a Maryland car dealership.  The owner discovered the following morning that the lock in the gas pump in his car outlet was dismantled  and more 200 liters of gasoline pilfered by still unidentified perpetrators.  It can only be surmised that American are also feeling the pinch now. There has also been a very significant rise in the number of commuters using the mass transit system to save on gas.

“Score one for the administration.” — Cris Maralit

* * *

Since 1 US gallon = 3.78541178 liter, that would put the U.S. premium gasoline price at $1.056688210549 or P45.58 which would be our price without VAT and the additional taxes and other charges that our government imposes.

A report on US television says that people in California are cutting down on their car usage to the point where sales in malls and downtown stores are affected.

Since a lot of us in the Philippines are poor, why do we still have traffic jams all over Metro Manila? One son in the states called to ask if there still was traffic on Edsa. Of course, there is and eight cylinder SUVs are still being sold and bought. Obviously, the rich do not feel any pinch although the daily wage earner is hard-hit by the oil and rice crises.

As for stealing gasoline from parked cars, this is a particularly middle class crime. After all, what would you do with gasoline if you did not own a car? Thus, don’t expect that to happen here unless one has a diesel machine in his car.

* * *

“At the risk of sounding like I am defending Meralco (which I am not), 72 million kWh is really not that much. If you divide 72 million by 3600 (your annual electricity consumption), it comes to 20,000. Which means 20,000 households, with each household consuming 3,600 kWh per year, will consume a total of 72 million kWh. That’s probably the population of a small city.

“I’m sure that Meralco has not been the ‘model corporate citizen it can be’, but instead of shooting the messenger, perhaps your investigative resources can be better utilized by looking at the policies that govern the pricing of generating and transmitting electricity to the consumers. Meralco has been operating for the past several decades, so it must be presumed that they were, and are abiding to the rules and regulations set by the government.” — Tony Serquina

* * *

The policies that the regulators – in this case the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) – write do not so much regulate the energy business; in fact, it sometimes seems that the utilities (especially when they are as large as Meralco) regulate the ERC and other agencies that are tasked with reigning in the greed of the capitalist.

In a poor country like the Philippines, the power of money is unbridled. Most regulators are easily dissuaded from being overly strict with those they are regulating.

Thanks for your computation. I am a writer not a math person.

* * *

On Monday, the Rotary Club of Pasig will hold its President’s Cup Golf Tournament at Sun Valley in Antipolo. This is a new course that is built like a private club with great grass and design that treats itself like a public course. Anyone can pay on the course by paying the green fee.

It is very near Forest Hills.

Our present RC Pasig President Conrad Cuesta ends his term in June. Our incoming President is Dr. Sonny Samson.

It should be a fun tournament as Rotary golf often is.

* * *

The five-day golf tournament of Paco Park Oasis Hotel (which is right beside Paco Park) is called the Oasis Park Hotel Golf Classic. Also, the schedule is Monday, April 19, 2008 at Canlubang. Tuesday it goes to Malarayat; Wednesday is Forest Hills; Thursday is at Sherwood and Friday at Canlubang, again.

# # # #

hvp 05.16.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Thank You, Senator Enrile!

“(T)he franchisee is allowed to charge one percent of its total sales as its own consumption. The ERC allows this. Thus, Meralco was just following the rules of the ERC.”

by Ducky Paredes

 

Thanks to Winston Garcia and Senator Juan Ponce Enrile, the cat is out of the bag and what a large, rotten cat it has turned out to be.

Senator Enrile almost missed his chance. The Chair of the joint legislative inquiry into our largest power provider was talking of adjourning when Enrile insisted that he had something important to take up.

Enrile first asked Meralco President Jesus Francisco just how much power Meralco itself uses. When he was told that this was in the vicinity of 72 million kilowatt-hours a year, Enrile asked whether this was being billed to us, Meralco’s customers, under the systems loss item on our billings.

The Meralco president seemed stumped by this question or maybe he just did not want to be the one to be the one who dropped the ball. He asked a subordinate to answer for Meralco. No, the man told, Enrile, this was not part of “systems loss” but Meralco’s own consumption was also being billed customers under another item in their monthly bills at the rate of P5.70 per kWh.

The next day, Ted Failon and Korina Sanchez on DZMM, the radio station owned by the Lopez family (that also controls Meralco) were interviewing a man from the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) and elicited from him the fact that the practice allowed in all power franchises by the ERC is that the franchisee is allowed to charge one percent of its total sales as its own consumption. The ERC allows this. Thus, Meralco was just following the rules of the ERC.

Thus, as it turns out, Francisco did not answer Enrile’s question. 72 million kWh is not what Meralco uses; it is what Meralco bills us. For all we know the 73 kWh (since it is allowed by the ERC) is much, much more than what Meralco would use for all of its offices.

One ought to ask the ERC:  Shouldn’t the country’s largest power franchise have less of an allocated percentage for its own use than smaller power franchises. One would expect there to be greater economies of scale for a franchise with a million subscribers than another franchise with only 10,000 subscribers.

Since Meralco is allowed to charge us so much more kilowatt-hours than it uses, could it be that Meralco officials actually get their power free? If they do that for their officers, how about the companies of the Lopez Family? Do we also pay for their power usage?

We are also reminded of the 2003 Supreme Court order for Meralco to refund its customers P30 billion in income taxes it passed on to its customers from 1994 to 2002.

 GSIS President Winston Garcia buried Meralco deeper when he commented during the hearing that Meralco should not only be paying for electricity it uses, but that it should be paying at the commercial rate of eight pesos per kilowatt hour.

 This position of Garcia makes sense since Meralco is a commercial enterprise for profit. Now, is it any wonder that Meralco posted a 60-percent increase in revenues in the first quarter of this year?

Commission chair Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago also made a valid point when she wondered why Meralco buys power from the wholesale electricity spot market (WESM) during peak hours when prices are naturally high, while it sources power from its own independent power producers (IPPs) during non-peak hours.

She said there might be an effort to show that Lopez-owned IPPs sell cheaper power than National Power Corporation and WESM.

On the IPP issue, Enrile quizzed Meralco officials about the ownership structure of Meralco and its IPPs and the apparent corporate layering. The Meralco talking heads went silent, disavowing any knowledge about the issue.

Meralco dealing with its own IPPs is a big issue when it comes to lowering power rates in the country because we have here a case of the Lopezes dealing with themselves. This is why Garcia had been asking for full transparency in Meralco.

Transparency on where it sources not only electricity, but also its meters, transformers, wires, etc. Transparency in its collection of electric bills from sister companies and transparency in the contracts entered into by Meralco, including insurance agreements with what is suspected to be a bogus insurance firm based in the Bahamas.

Garcia may have opened a can of worms at Meralco and it is in the interest of all Filipinos to make the Lopezes accountable to Meralco shareholders and customers, and to the fullest extent of the law.

* * *

The 33rd Oasis Park Hotel Invitational Golf Tournament starts on Monday, April 19, 2008 at Canlubang. Tuesday it goes to Malarayat; Wednesday is Forest Hills; Thursday is at Riviera and Friday at Canlubang, again.

This is a tournament that brings players into the country from Europe, Asia and even America and is held two to three times a year. It ought to be endorsed by the Department of Tourism. In fact, the DOT ought to organize golf tours as they do in Thailand.

Bill Percy, the President of Oasis Park Hotel on Belen St. in Paco has been running this tournament for his friends and hotel clientele who come from all over the world. It is five days of golf, camaraderie and a lot of partying.

Local players are welcome to join. There’s a lot of friendly betting that goes on. I will sometimes play in one or two of the days. Five days of golf is a little much for me.

# # # #

hvp 05.15.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Edu Under Attack Again

Malaya (05.15.08)

 

“One has to wonder: Has the OMB under Manzano been closing down outlets of pirated media of friends close to Congressman Tieng?”

by Ducky Paredes

 

One need not wonder that Movie Star and Television host Optical Media Board Chairman Edu  Manzano is again under attack in Congress.  This comes up every time that there are budget hearings. What is refreshing is that the ones who are upset with Edu are always those who are, like Edu, involved in show business. This must mean that he is doing a good job.

Before Edu’s volunteer  nemesis was Senator Bong Revilla. Presently, it is another showbiz person, Part-list Rep. William Tieng of the Buhay Party who has been overly critical of Manzano. One has to wonder: Has the OMB under Manzano been closing down outlets of pirated media of friends close to Congressman Tieng?

Perhaps, after all, Congressman Tieng scores the OMB under Manzano as being ”selective” in their raids on these outlets.

Is it possible that the incessant OMB raids are hurting some people close to him?

The lawmaker also again brings up the  accusation that Edu has not been attending to the budget hearings. Yet, if he asks around, he will see, from his own staff, the autographs and pictures of Edu for each time that he goes to Congress. According to OMB Executive Director Atty. Rosendo Meneses, the records will show that Chairman Manzano has been in Congress each time his presence was needed.

The Buhay Party representative also says that the OMB is “inefficient.”

Contrary to Congressman Tieng’s claim, the OMB has scored very significant gains in the fight against piracy in the country, backing up this claim with the following figures:

In 2007, OMB conducted 2,526 operations and seized 4.8 million units of pirated optical discs estimated to be worth P1.12 billion.

The OMB filed 22 criminal charges against those arrested during the raids, plus some 2,500 administrative complaints nine of which involved CD replicating machines used in the production of counterfeit CDs.

Of the total 573 raids conducted by law enforcement agencies against piracy, 77 percent or 443 were made by the OMB.

The OMB accomplishments for 2007 formed a major part of the basis for the Special 301 Reports issued first week of May 2008 by the United States Trade Representative (USTR) where the Philippines was commended for being one of only seven countries that showed significant progress in implementing controls on optical media production.

Equally impressive results against piracy in numerous OMB operations in prior years led the US Trade Representative in 2006 to scratch the Philippines from its Priority Watch List and place it on the Ordinary Watch List. The Priority Watch List contains the names of countries that have earned notoriety for rampant piracy and widespread violations of Intellectual Property Rights.

As for Manzano not attending OMB budget hearings, perhaps Rep. Tieng can help fight piracy by convincing his fellow legislators to increase OMB’s P25 million budget. He does not need Manzano’s presence to do that.

As it is, most of that money goes to Salaries, maintenance and administrative expenses. OMB’s budget for enforcement operations is less than  P100,00 monthly.

That the OMB can still do its job at all is a feather in Edu Manzano’s cap.

* * *

If you were not able to go for the Initial Public Offering (IPO) of San Miguel Beer, Inc. (SMB) which was available Monday, it is too late for you. You missed out on a good one. Today, it is doing P8.60 from the IPO price of P8.00.

Following a week-long domestic offer period and two weeks of international road shows, San Miguel Beer Inc, (SMB) San Miguel Corporation’s crown jewel attracted substantial interest, with the local tranche oversubscribed a day before the close of subscriptions on 05 May.

SMB may turn out  to be the country’s biggest IPO this year. At its IPO price, securities company IGC Securities, Inc.  placed SMB’s P/E of 13.4x in 2008 at a 20% premium over the market’s P/E of 11.2x.

The beer business accounts for around 40% of San Miguel Corporation’s (SMC) operating profit.

Citing the company’s track record of profitability, its reasonable value relative to the market, its consistent earnings growth and rich dividend yield, IGC Securities, Inc. had recommended SMB, as solid long-term investment, saying that the IPO “will unlock SMB’s hidden value. . .as it is poised to benefit from greater management once it becomes a stand-alone public company.”

In its report sent to investors, IGC Securities, Inc. said, “SMB offers a pure-play in the best part of SMC, without the overhang from its non-core businesses.”  Furthermore, it said “the historical data that show the operational improvements… [will] eventually lead to market out-performance in the next 2-3 years.”

The securities firm’s strong “long-term buy” recommendation is also based on a promised rich dividend yield of 6.5%, 44% higher compared to the market’s average yield of 4.5%.  “SMB’s dividend policy is to payout 100% of its earnings,”  the report said.

Of the shares offered, 90% percent are secondary shares belonging to SMC and ten percent are new shares issued by SMB. Only the proceeds from the 10% new shares will go to SMB.

According to an analyst’s report: “Though domestic beer volumes have been flat from 2005-07 at 13mn hectoliters/year, revenues have been driven by price increases while margins buoyed by cost control.

“Going forward, SMB aims to increase the size of the Philippine beer market and its already commanding 95% share of the market by deepening its geographic coverage (distribution) and increasing product visibility (advertising and promotion).”

Watch for more IPO’s as SMC sheds off other stand-along companies of the group – packaging, bottling and others.

It’s nice to see that the Boss – Danding Cojuangco – will eventually be riding off into the sunset with what has become his greatest business achievement poised for even greater success. Comfortable in the SMC nest, the other companies might have been stunted. On their own as stand-alone companies, they must grow wings.

# # # #

hvp 05.14.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Ashmore Buys 40% of Petron

“Ashmore has been investing in the Philippines since the 1990s and has exposures in Maynilad, Alphaland, Subic Power, to mention a few.”

 by Ducky Paredes

             In the end, the government did the only thing it could do with the offer of Ashmore, a leading emerging markets fund manager based in London, to purchase the 40% share in Petron of Aramco, the Saudi Arabian petroleum company.

During the term of President Fidel Ramos, the idea privatization was the thing for governments to do; the other idea of partnering with Saudi Arabia also seemed like a great idea. Thus, when Petron, 100% owned by the government was privatized, 40% of Petron was offered to Aramco Overseas Company BV. Another 20% was sold to the investing public and second 40% remained with the Philippine National Oil Company (PNOC),

The partnership between PNOC and Aramco was sealed on Feb.3, 1994 when the two parties signed a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA). Thus begun the union between the country’s largest oil refining company and the world’s number one exporter of petroleum. 

Petron supplies more than 41% of the country’s oil requirements while Saudi Aramco supplies more than 56% of the world’s. More than 92 % of Philippine crude oil requirements come from the Middle East.  

Recently, however, for whatever reasons it may have had, Aramco decided to totally divest its shares in Petron. Aside from economies of scale, the Arabian company had decided to pursue still another oil development project that will boost its oil production output from 11 million barrels per day (MBPD) to 12.5 MBPD.

Last March, as provided for in the exit clause of the 1994 SPA, a 60-day notice ending May 11 was issued to the PNOC by Aramco asking the former to exercise its right of first offer (ROFO) to buy its 40% share that it had offered to the Ashmore Group of London.

With Aramco’s announcement of divesting its shares, three courses of action were open to PNOC:

PNOC could exercise its Right of First Offer (ROFO) within 60 days upon receipt of the Transfer Notice; or, it could assign its ROPO to a third party; or, just do nothing and not avail of the ROFO.

 (There were feeble efforts to extend the deadline but Aramco rejected these outright because it would adversely affect Aramco and Ashmore’s business plans.)

Should PNOC have grabbed the 40% Aramco shares? PNOC and government do not have the financial capability to pay Aramco the $687.60 to $825 million required to cover the transaction. The government has to work with budgets and no appropriation for such an amount had been set aside.

Also, under our present fiscal situation, that money could be better used to address the requirements for food, housing, infrastructure, education, livelihood, alternative energy search and other pressing social and financial concerns.

Also, a government buy back would run counter to the liberalization and privatization policy.

Government control of Petron would not necessarily translate to lower oil prices since pricing is determined by the oil producing countries and not by the Philippine government

The petroleum business is a supply-and-demand driven industry. (Predictions are that the ever-increasing demand from China, India, Korea and Japan will not diminish and may even increase, regardless of the soaring cost of oil.)

If the government decides to borrow to bankroll its repurchase of Petron, such borrowings would increase interest expense and negatively affect our fiscal position since this is not part of the programmed borrowings for 2008

According to the Department of Budget and Management (DBM), making such a huge payment would cause a budget deficit of P23 billion, pointing out that this amount could be more useful in building more than 1,000 kilometers of road or other necessary projects.

It is also pointed out that with the global experience of Ashmore and its presence in major capitals around the world (including the Philippines where it has large investments in real estate, among others), the share value of Petron would rise in our stock market impact on the 60% owned by local investors and PNOC. This can then be sold at a very high margin in pursuance of the government’s liberalization and privatization policy.

The idea that re-nationalization of Petron would enable government to control the movement of petroleum products locally is invalid. How can this happen when the main pricing decisions are made abroad and are dictated by the OPEC?

As to the Ramos reason for bringing in Saudi Aramco in order to assure us a steady supply of oil, Aramco has done that for us by affirming its commitment to supply the Philippines with oil in case of shortages up to 2014. Saudi King Abdul Azziz made the same commitment to the President when she visited the kingdom in 2006

The buyer, Ashmore Group was established in 1992 as the emerging markets division of Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) Bank. It was spun off in 1999 as a result of a buyout by managers of the fund. Ashmore is the founder and co-chair of the Emerging Markets Trade Association (EMTA)

 It was listed in the London Stock Market in 2006. As of 2007, Ashmore managed US$365 billion in pooled funds and structured products that cater to institutional clients worldwide, including central banks, governments, public corporations and giant insurance companies. The investment in Petron is held by four funds with a net asset value of US$9 billion.

Ashmore has been investing in the Philippines since the 1990s and has exposures in Maynilad, Alphaland, Subic Power, to mention a few. Ashmore also has large invested funds in China, Indonesia, Russia, South America, Singapore and Thailand.

* * *

We found out from the congressional hearing on power that a power company was allowed up to 1% of all its sales as its own consumption that it could charge its clientele. Considering the size of Meralco’s sales, this is in the millions of kilowatt-hours monthly which could give all of its executives and even some Lopez companies free electricity.

This is a bad regulation. Sure, a franchise-holder in a rural area could probably use up to 1% of its sales for its offices but with the large Meralco franchise area, even .01 percent (a hundred times less than what Meraco now claims for its own consumption, as allowed by the ERC) would probably already suffice to take care of all the Meralco offices.

# # # #

hvp 05.13.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

The Lopez Family Under Siege

“The question is: should public interest prevail over private profits?” 

by Ducky Paredes

“In third world countries like the Philippines, equal justice will have a synthetic ring unless the economic rights of the people, especially the poor, are protected with the same resoluteness as their right to liberty. The cases at bar are of utmost significance for they concern the right of our people to electricity and to be reasonably charged for their consumption. In configuring the contours of this economic right to a basic necessity of life, the Court shall define the limits of the power of respondent Meralco, a giant public utility and a monopoly, to charge our people for their electric consumption. The question is: should public interest prevail over private profits?” – Supreme Court Ruling on G.R. No. 141314, November 15, 2002 written by then Associate Justice Reynato Puno.

Ambassador Allistair McDonald of the European Commission notes that one of the major reasons why the Philippines is not attracting as much foreign direct investments as other countries is it high rates of energy.  In is speech at a business forum, the Ambassador bluntly declared: “The price of electricity is higher in the Philippines than almost any country in the region.”

The Manila Electric Company is the largest and oldest distributor of electricity in the Philippines.  It supplies electricity to a franchise area covering nearly 10,000 square kilometers with a population of around 20 million.  The company serves four million customers in 23 cities and 88 municipalities in Metro Manila, Bulacan, Rizal and Cavite and parts of Laguna, Quezon and Batangas.  This is known as the industrial enclave of the country.  Imagine that Meralco produces 50 percent of the Philippines’ Gross Domestic Product (GDP)!

It is thus a gargantuan company imbued with the public interest since it is operating a public utility obligated by law to “ensure transparent and reasonable prices of electricity in a regime of free and fair competition and full public accountability.” 

 So, why does it seem as though the Lopez family is running Meralco like a personal empire? The general impression is that the Lopezes milk financial benefits from Meralco for the family’s interests. Yet the Lopezes own only 26.82 percent of Meralco through the First Philippine Holdings Company, which they control.  The Philippine government, through government-owned and controlled corporations, owns 28.2 percent of the corporation.  Other stockholders, corporate or individual, hold the rest of the shares.

The failure of Meralco to keep electricity rates in the Philippines on a competitive level with those of other countries shows that it has failed to keep faith with its franchise to serve the public interest while making only “reasonable” profits. 

No less than the Supreme Court (in G.R. No. 141314) ordered Meralco to reimburse its millions of customers for overcharged rates amounting to P30 billion.

Meralco critics charge it with other “frauds” like buying power at higher rates from Lopez-owned Independent Power Producers through sweetheart contracts, breach of contract with the National Power Corporation (Napocor), illegally charging customers with billions of pesos in “systems losses” which are entirely due to management’s inefficiency, tax evasion and other financial shenanigans.  In fact, a Meralco consumer has sued the firm in Pasay City for “market power abuses or anti-competitive or discriminatory act or behavior” in violation of the Electric Power Industry Reform Act or EPIRA.

Concerned for the welfare of electric consumers and also worried about the non-competitiveness of the Meralco rates, the President has directed the Department of Trade and Industry to appeal to the Energy Regulatory Commission to compel Meralco to lower its rates.

Winson Garcia, president and general manager of the Government Service Insurance System, has asked Meralco to open its books and submit its documents to full scrutiny by the public and its stockholders in the spirit of transparency.  Garcia sits in the firm’s board of directors as representative of 1.2 million GSIS members who are major stockholders of Meralco.

However, the Lopez-controlled top management of Meralco has refused thus far to open its books of accounts and operations, prompting Garcia to threaten to file charges of fraud, estafa and breach of franchise provisions against Meralco. This violates the EPIRA law mandating that franchisees be transparent and accountable.

Meralco has also entered into what some suspect to be sweetheart contracts with IPPs owned by the Lopezes at prices higher than those charged by the NAPOCOR. Meralco critics hold that if Meralco bought all its power from Napocor then consumers would fully enjoy the mandated rate reduction of thirty centavos per kilowatt-hour required by EPIRA; Meralco counters that the Lopez IPPs actually reduce the over-all cost of electricity.

Clearly, though, the Lopez management of Meralco has failed to comply with its franchise obligations to the Filipino people.  Perhaps, a new management team is needed to step in.  In the meantime it should open its books and other documents to its own stockholders and the general public for a full accounting of its operations.  This may be the only way that trusts in the Lopez family and Meralco can be regained.

Let not Manila Rep. Amado Bagatsing be proven right when he says about Meralco:  “This is a fight between the common people of our country against corporate greed.”

# # # #

hvp 05.12.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Papaano ka na, Pinas?

Deretsahan

ni Horacio Paredes

Sa aking palagay, ang dapat mangyari sa Pinas ay ang kalimutan na natin ang pulitika. Ito kasi ang nagpapalubog sa bansang ito kung kaya parang lalo lamang tayong nalulubog sa problema.

Ang dapat nating maging lider ay ang taong hindi ang sarili ang iniiisip kundi ang kabutihan ng bayan. Ang malungkot dito ay halos lahat ng mga nagpiprisinta sa pagka-Presidente as 2010 ay pawang pulitika lamang ang nasasa-isip. Wala naman silang pananaw para sa Pinas at kung papaano aayusin ang bansa natin para magkaroon tayo ng pag-asang umunlad.

Napakarami ang kailangang ituwid sa bansa natin. Ang gobiyerno’y dapat na naglilingkod sa bayan at sa mamamayan at hindi ang kabaliktaran na nangyayari ngayon. Ang dapat na inaatupag ng pamahalaan ay kung papaanong magkakaroon ng trabaho sa loob ng Pinas ang lahat nang Pinoy na naghahanap ng trabaho. Dapat na itigil na natin ang pag-iisip na mas magandang makapagtrabaho sa labas ng bansa. Ang dapat na ayusin natin at ating paunlarin ay ang sarili nating bansa at hindi ang ibang bansa!

Dapat rin na pigilan na rin natin ang paglaki ng ating populasyon. Hindi lamang sa dapat na kaya nating pakainin ang lahat na Pilipino, dapat rin na ang populasyon natin ay hindi mas malaki kaysa sa kakayaning suportahan ng ating ekonomiya.

Dapat rin na ang ating mga kabataan ay matutong mahalin ang sarili nilang bansa. Hindi ito maaaring mangyari habang ang lahat na nakikita nila ay ang mga billboard na nagpapasalamat kay kongresman, senador o presidente sa ginawang bagong kalsada o para sa rebulto ng isang pulitiko o sa bagong gusali. Hindi naman galing sa kanila ito; bakit tayo pumapayag na angkinin nila ang galing naman sa bansa at hindi sa kanila?

Papaano kaya maisasa-ayos ang lahat na ito?

Kung mayroon sana tayong isang kagaya ni Magsaysay na naging pangulo natin noong kailangang-kailangan natin ng isang tao na magtutuwid ang bansa, baka magkaroon tayo ng pag-asa. Sa aking natatanaw sa ngayon, parang wala akong nakikitang may kakayahang magtuwid sa bansang ito na may pagasang manalo sa pagka-pangulo.

Mayroong mga may kaya ngunit kulang naman sa kwarta at popularidad. At dahil sa matuwid at istrikto sila, marahil na hindi sila tatanggapin nang karamihan sa ating mga botante na kwarta pa rin at pansarili ang nasasa-isip..

* * *

May sulat galing sa isang ayaw pang magpakilala: “Nabasa po namin ang column ninyo na ang pamagat ay ‘Matagal Nang Alam Nila (Kuno).’

“Sangayon parin kami sa mga nakasulat sa column ninyo, kong hindi lang sana padalos-dalos ang ating gobyerno mula pa sa unang mga panahon na ini-intruduced ang birth control nay an, sana hindi dumami ang population natin ngayon, saganon hindi sana tayo kinukulang sa supply ng bigas.

“Kaya ito ay ‘lesson learned’ na ngayon ng ating gobyerno, na dapat hindi na sana pinakinggan ang mga interbensyon ng Simbahan at ituloy ang planong pag control ng population sa pamamagitan ng mga programa na nakabubuti sa lahat.

“Maraming tao ang Pilipinas kulang naman sa resources, hindi mabigyan ng trabaho ng gobyerno, ang iba naman diyan mga pasaway din, tamad, so walang mangyari.

“Kaya para sa amin kong maari ‘intense reform’ ang  kailangan sa Pilipinas kung kinakailangan na gamitan ng radical action para sa kabutihan ng lahat at sa bansa sa pangkalahatan, susuporta kaming lahat na OFW’s sa buong mundo.

“Iyon lang po. Maraming salamat.” – OFWs, Middle East

Salamat rin at sana’y dumami ang nag-iisip nang kagaya ninyo.

# # # #

hvp (05.12.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Noli’s Dilemma

“Noli’s problem is understandable. He would be an unknown if the Lopez family that controls Meralco had not picked him to be the premier newsreader in ABS-CBN.”

 

by Ducky Paredes

 

The silence of Vice President Noli de Castro as the reality of the unconscionably high power distribution rates of Meralco sets in to the public consciousness would be understandable if he were no longer interested in public office after his term ends in 2010.

If he has further ambitions to remain in office, he ought to speak up. First of all, it is becoming clear that most of his political allies and his main political patron – the President – are one in showing an interest in how to bring down what we pay for electricity.

Second, our high rates (among the highest in our part of the world) have been among the negatives whenever anyone considers investing in this country.

Noli’s problem is understandable. He would be an unknown if the Lopez family that controls Meralco had not picked him to be the premier newsreader in ABS-CBN (another Lopez company). Noli was then a nobody. After he started voicing the TV news, he became an instant celebrity.

(Another politician who took the same path to fame was Senator Loren Legarda and while she has also been silent on the present issue, she has already shown her independence from her former employer in many ways.}

GSIS President Winston Garcia who (through GSIS) controls 30 % of the shares of Meralco wonders why Meralco charges its Luzon customers more than what power distributors in his native Cebu are charging their customers. Winston, as a shareholder, wants to know why this is and demands that the books of the company be opened to him. Meralco has refused saying it cannot trust Garcia not to divulge company secrets to its competitors and the government.

What is really keeping the Vice President from taking up the cause of the millions of poor Filipinos suffering from high food and power prices? Noli says that these poor folk voted for him in 2004; if they actually did, shouldn’t he now take up their cause? Should he just allow them to suffer higher power rates without even asking Meralco to explain it?

Or is Noli, after all these many years as a senator and the country’s No 2 man still beholden to the Lopezes? Is he hoping that the family will still help him become President in 2010?

Quezon Rep. Danilo Suarez speaking about opposition congressmen says: “To defend Meralco, whose high rates are making life doubly hard for our people, runs against the grain of many of my colleagues’ avowed stance in the past.

“Thus, I am puzzled why they have dropped their populist positions all of a sudden to defend Meralco by mouthing its line that the government is out to wrest control of the company.”

The same observation can be made about our Vice President.

Manila Rep. Amado Bagatsing says that the fight over Meralco is one between “the poor and corporate greed, and transparency against keeping Filipinos in the dark on why they are saddled with the highest electricity rates in Southeast Asia.

 ”There can be no fence-sitters in this issue. Either you’re with our long-suffering countrymen or you’re not in this battle royale. I am, thus, bewildered why self-proclaimed pro-poor politicians are suddenly defending Meralco.”

 Bagatsing stressed that those who have less in life should have more in law, thus he is moving for the repeal of a law – Republic Act 7832 – which he said is being used by Meralco as an excuse to hike power rates.

 RA 7832, or the Anti-electricity and Electric Transmission Lines-Materials Pilferage Act of 1994, allows power distributors like Meralco to pass on to their customers up to 9.5 percent of their so-called systems losses.

 Systems losses refer to electricity lost to pilferage and its inefficient distribution.

 Bagatsing explained that RA 7832 is a “class legislation” in that it allows power distributors to recover losses by passing them on to the public, something which is not available to other utilities: “This law penalizes the people for the incompetence of power distributors like Meralco to crack down on pilferers and their inefficiency in distributing power.

 ”RA 7832 has to go. It rewards corporate inefficiency while penalizes consumers over things that are no fault of theirs.”

 In 2003, the Supreme Court found Meralco passing on to its customers its income tax charges from 1994 to 2003. The high court promptly ordered the company to refund its customers P30 billion.

 The following year, the Supreme Court again stopped Meralco’s collection of a provisional increase, which was not subjected to public scrutiny.

 Thus, whatever Meralco does now, it is fair to assume that (having been found out before to be doing so) that it could again be in violation of ethical practices.

National Labor Union (NLU) president Dave Diwa chimes in with this observation: “Vice President De Castro cannot wait for a script to read because if one comes his way from the Lopezes, it would surely run against the interest of the people who he claimed voted for him. 

“It’s a make or break situation for him, and he cannot keep mum on it.”

* * *

From a American veteran who fought World War II in the Philippines comes this bit: “Your article on ‘white Pinoys’ reminded me of once when I was at a fiesta in a barrio in Cebu, We were playing softball and the umpire said to me: ‘Mr. Steve, do you know why the Filipino is brown?’

“I said no. He proceeded to tell me that when God made man, he made him out of bread dough and put him in the oven to cook. After 5 minutes he took him out and said,  “He is too white.” He then made another man out of dough and put him in the oven and raised the heat and after 20 minutes he took him out and said,  “He is too black”. He then made another and put him in the oven and reduced the heat and took him out in 10 minutes and took him out and he was a nice brown and the Lord said: ‘Perfect!’ 

“I do not think that your legislators are colonially minded; I know that they are Dollar minded.“

# # # #

hvp 05.11.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

On Meralco

“Where does one find political will? I have been hearing that all my life but I have never found anyone who could tell me where to find it.”

by Ducky Paredes

Who’s right and who’s wrong on Meralco?

It is the wrong signal to investors and the investing public if government will take over Meralco, The government should not be in an acquisitive mode because it is, simply put, essentially incompetent to run industries and private businesses even when these control vital industries. Besides, if it does not have enough funds for social services, what is it doing buying up private companies?

Besides, our public service is just not set up to do what needs doing. All that it is good for is to do as whoever the President is wants done. Examples of this incompetence are legion and are part and parcel of the way that government has been run in this country and is not limited to the present administration.

An industry leader, on being told at a rotary meeting that all that was needed by his industry was political will, replied: “Where does one find political will? I have been hearing that all my life but I have never found anyone who could tell me where to find it.”

Politics – the prevailing culture in any administration that comes into office due to a popular vote – will, more often than not, place incompetents (political cronies) in positions of power in government-owned and controlled corporations (GOCCs).

Winston Garcia, President of the Government System Insurance Service (GSIS) is a rarity in government for being someone who knows what he is doing and does what he knows needs doing even when this is the unpopular thing to do. (Another example of this is Bayani Fernando, Chairman of the Metro Manila Development Authority). Winston fired the first salvo against Meralco precisely because he is watching out for the funds of the GSIS.

GSIS owns 33% of Meralco and has four seats on the Meralco board; the Lopez family though its First Philippine Holdings Corp owns 33.4 percent and is in virtual control of Meralco. The public holds the remaining 33.6 percent.

Winston wants to know whether the GSIS funds are invested in a properly run company. His question is this: Is Meralco being run to unduly favor the Lopez family’s other businesses? In their dealings with Meralco, are the other businesses of the Lopezes – including power plants that supply power to Meralco – being favored over the interests of Meralco? This is a fair question from someone who owns 33% of a company; yet, Meralco says it cannot trust Winston Garcia enough to let him in on all of the family secrets.

Thus, Winston has brought this out for all to hear and see the coming catfight. This is also what Winston did in Equitable-PCIB. He got away with selling the GSIS stake in that one at a slight premium price over what the Social Security System (SSS) pension fund for non-government employees got for its shares in the same bank.

Now, Oscar Lopez, president of First Philippine Holdings Corp. has said of the mess that Garcia is creating: “If he wants, he can buy us out. I am sick and tired of this business. We even can’t get a rate increase because the government is saying our rate is too high.”

Lopez points out that it is actually government that is responsible for its high rates. Look at your Meralco bill. The government takes over 10% in taxes; it is also paid most of the generation and transmission charges which go to Napocor and Transco. Meralco keeps for itself only 24% of what you pay Meralco. Thus, if the complaint is serious about what power costs the consumer, the one to be talked to is government itself and not Meralco,

The last time Meralco was allowed by the Energy Regulatory Commission to raise its basic distribution charge was in June 2003.

Sen. Rodolfo Biazon notes: “If government succeeds to effect government control and management of the company we will witness a parade of incompetent political appointees who will be coming one after another depending on the direction of the political winds.”

Amen. Still, Winston Garcia, representing 33% of Meralco shares ought to be given what he wants to know and should not be treated like a poor relative who is shunted off to a table too far away from where the big boys are.

* * *

Invited to hit a ceremonial ball at the current Philippine Seniors Amateur Golf Championships at the Langer Course at Riviera golf and country club as the President of the Federation of Philippine Amateurs Senior Golfers, Inc. (FPASGI), I played in a foursome with Ogie Manalo, President of the Federation of Golf Clubs, Jun Galindez, Secretary-General of the National Golf Association of the Philippines (NGAP), the organizer of the tournament and Fidel V. Ramos.

At our level of play, our golf was not the same game that the leaders – Clavecilla, Hernandez, Manotoc, Viray and Gaston – were playing. It was, however, still an enjoyable foursome. We had just two pars among the four of us playing 18 holes each, which computes to a par production of less than three percent. Our first par came on the 13th hole and it was FVR’s. He was on in two over two ravines and two-putted for his par. The other par was an easy one on the par three 17th – six feet from the hole and I missed the easy birdie putt.

For those curious about FVR as a golfer, here are my observations: He has a great swing. It is as you see it in the instructional videos – smooth and full, from a backswing that is parallel at the top and a follow-through that is also almost parallel at the top. He putts with a long putter and is pretty good at it. My own putting was awful –  two four-putts and several three-putts.

What I marveled at is that FVR walked the full 18 holes, explaining when asked, that this is one of the requisites for keeping one’s health as one ages. The Langer Course is a long and tough walk and many of the tee boxes, where one hits his next shot, are a long walk from the previous green. The terrain is also hilly to mountainous. And, to think that the former President was 78 last year!

For those younger who want to remain as strong and healthy when they get to be Eddie Ramos’ age: Sell that golf cart and walk the course!

It was fun playing with FVR. It was also a great learning experience.

# # # #

hvp 05.09.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

The ‘White’ Pinoys

“Is there a desire in the Pinoy psyche to be white? There are so many Philippine products that sell on the claim that it will give the user whiter skin. Why is this?

by Ducky Paredes

 

Are we anti-Asian of are we just socially closer to Europe and America because of our colonial past? Is it a carryover from those times that we sometimes seem to prefer things western to things that are Asian?

Or are we just mindlessly following whatever we see are the fashions and likes of the white men? Is there a desire in the Pinoy psyche to be white? There are so many Philippine products that sell on the claim that it will give the user whiter skin. Why is this?

Do we hate the original kayumanggi skin of the Filipino that a lot of foreigners love so much?

Certainly, even our legislators seem to prefer foreign to local as in the laws that they write for automating our elections. We will be trying out in the elections for the autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) three months from now several machines using different technologies but all coming from outside the country.

Other countries automated their elections such as India and Korea. Did they use foreign machines? No. They developed their own and have succeeded with them. Here, in order to qualify, the machine should have been used in automated elections over several years with so many million voters using them.

In order to qualify for that, a Filipino inventor would have had to develop and election machine, sold it to another country, which would have used it over several elections before bringing that machine back to the Philippines so that it can qualify under the rules written by our legislators.

Our own legislators write laws that exclude Pinoy techies from the bidding. How smart is that?

This is part of the leavings of our colonial masters – a lack of belief in the Pinoy and an over-reliance on the wonders that come from the western world.

In computers, we are at least at par with the rest of the world. We have very good to excellent programmers and other technical person who could (and have) created systems for automating our elections but who are not given the time of day by our legislators.

One was even called a “braggart” by a congressman for having the temerity to prove that his system was superior to what the congressman was apparently pushing. (Perhaps, he will make a small commission of the deal if the system he was pushing can be sold to the Comelec.)

Sadly, the reality is that our own congress (and our congressmen) has no real love for this country and its people. Wouldn’t the proper thing to do be to push for Pinoy developed systems to use in our own elections?

But, no, they will not do that. Why take a chance on something local when one can buy something similar from other countries? The presumption of our colonially minded legislators is that if something is made outside this country, it has to be better than anything that Pinoys can invent, manufacture or do.

Should we wonder why this country is not going anywhere?

* * *

There is an issue regarding the decision of the Manila City Council that was backed up by the Supreme Court that will greatly affect investors in this country.

When the City Council of Manila decided that the oil companies must relocate from the Pandacan Oil Depot that they have been using since before World War II, they created a legal pickle. What the council did is called “spot zoning.”

It re-zoned a small part of the city to suit the current situation. Pandacan was always an industrial zone. It was that when the oil depots were set up in the area. That there were a lot of squatters around the oil depot and that the city grew around the area to the point where the council considered that a terrorist attack on the oil facilities could wreak great havoc on the city and have a death toll that could surpass the 9-11 terrorist attack on New York.

Thus, the council, in effect re-zoned the Pandacan oil depot site to get that dreadful possibility out of their minds.

First of all, they should have considered other things such as what it would cost to relocate that depot. If oil prices are now so high as to be almost unaffordable, the relocation will increase costs even more since what is now cheaply moved by pipeline will have to be trucked, amore expensive proposition. Trucking our oil supply into the city will also increase the traffic coming into Metro Manila.

But the greatest loss would be the country’s credibility to our investors. Imagine that one could invest millions in, say, a warehouse, which a succeeding elected administration might rezone into one where no warehouses are admitted.

Actually, this is also happening in other places. Why are schools, for instance, allowed to be built in what ought to be purely residential areas?

In the case of the Pandacan Oil Depot, this was originally in an industrial zone and the residential area simply grew around it. So, why should the Oil Depots now be the one that has to leave the area when it was there before all of those houses?

Of course, people will go where they can and if there is money to be earned somewhere, the more that they will congregate in that area. Still, considering that when one buys an industrial site, the normal way is to invest the area with more machinery, equipment and facilities as the years go by.

One realizes that Pandacan would probably be a nicer place if the depot was not in the area, the reality is that if the depot had not be there, the whole neighborhood would have been taken over by squatters and would be an even uglier and m ore dangerous neighborhood than it now is.

* * *

Selling Petron to the Gokongweis, a family with interests in petrochemicals and an airline makes more sense than giving it to Ashmore, a financing firm. Who would run it for Ashmore so that its 40 percent is protected?

As it is, Petron has so many problems – tax debts, suits from Bataan province and a host of other problems, including allocating millions to move its oil depot out of the Pandacan area that the smartest thing to do with it is what Aramco did – find someone who will buy them out.

# # # #

hvp 05.08.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

That ‘Systems Loss’

“(W)hy charge us a tax on something we never bought or used and which Meralco lost because it does not have a secure system. Thus, we are being taxed for Meralco’s inefficiencies. How fair is that?”

by Ducky Paredes

 

Sen. Chiz Escudero makes sense when he says that there should be no Value-Added Tax imposed on the charges that the Manila Electric Company (Meralco) puts in our electric bills as “systems loss.”

Escudero who is the chairman of the Senate Ways and Means committee, explains that “systems loss” comes from other people’s illegal power line connections, which loss is charged to us paying customers.

Escudero says: “VAT is supposed to be a levy on goods and services, on tangibles one receives and enjoys, not on imaginary things like electricity which has vaporized or been vandalized.”

The Manila Electric Company (Meralco) imposes a 7.8 percent system loss on monthly billings to residential consumers. Says Chiz: “It is bad enough that we end up paying for electricity that is lost to illegal connections ‘and to heat,’ but coughing up with an additional 12 percent tax on phantom power is too much.”

Can one impose a VAT on something that Meralco lost which it charges everyone of its customers pro-rate, according to how high one’s usage of power is? Chiz sees the VAT on systems loss as a tax on theft. Escudero says that, in this case, the victim of the theft pays a tax on what he lost. “But he does not pay only for the actual cost of what had been stolen from him; he becomes a victim twice over when he pays, by some weird logic, a 12 percent tax on the reimbursement he pays on behalf of the thief.”

I see it as even worse since you and I as Meralco customers never lost anything. It was Meralco that lost the power that it purchased and which was not purchased but disappeared. So, why charge us that and – we ask the government – why charge us a tax on something we never bought or used  and which Meralco lost because it does not have a secure system.

Thus, we are being taxed for Meralco’s inefficiencies. How fair is that?

In reality this is built into every power franchise. What bugs the government about this is that Meralco, the largest power distributor, also has the largest systems losses at close to eight percent. While paying this may hurt, what hurts even more is why we are paying VAT on this item, which is something we never used.

In fact, as one jaded old man asked when reading his Meralco bill: “Why are we paying for missionaries? I thought we did that in church?”

(If you did not get that, look at your Meralco bill – closely, item by item.)

* * *

An Australian doctor sees the problem that dialysis patients have in Australia. More than 1,800 of them are waiting for kidney transplants; yet, in 2007, only 343 kidneys were donated. In fact, the average wait in Australia for a kidney is four years.

So, Kidney specialist Gavin Carney proposes  that the government pay up to $47,000 Australian (P1,868,954.52) for kidney donations. That should take care of the shortage.  If what did that here, it would surely work, too.

Of course, there are those who oppose this. The basic objection is that people should not be allowed to market their organs and that if one did his it would be exploiting the poor who would be the ones who would sell a kidney for that kind of money.

But, let’s look at this dispassionately. We actually pay for blood donations, don’t we? The amounts may not be as high as they are for kidneys but amounts are paid for donated blood – so many pesos for so many pints. So, why not a price for kidneys that the government will pay donors?

A system where one is allowed to donate something when it comes from the bottom of one’s heart will work only if the recipients also will reciprocate the donor’s charity with their own and also from the bottom of their hearts meaning that they will more than match the donation. What would be ideal is one where donors and recipients become part of a community where, after the transplant, the recipients will go out of their way to help the donors and their families in their economic and other problems.

 A recipient could find a job for a donor’s daughter or son or take care of the education of a donor’s child or even include a donor’s family in his health plan or help them get a new home, a cavan of rice every month or some such thing. In reality, the donor gave the recipient something that the recipient can never repay – his health. So, why not be generous, too.

That is one way. But the suggestion of Dr. Carney is also another way of doing this. The government rewards those who would donate something of themselves for others, As in blood donations, there is a monetary reward. Why not for kidneys?

“I don’t support (illegal trade),” Carney said. “But I also do not agree with the fact that we should let people just rot on dialysis until they have been on dialysis so long they are untransplantable.”

That Aussie doctor talks a lot of sense.

* * *

As long as the Church allows the Santacruzan to become a contest of make-up, dresses and money, it cannot be a proper devotion to Our Lady. That gays will dress themselves in expensive finery, hire the best-looking boys to squire them seems only fitting. Do the other sagalas actually think of Our Lady and of giving her honor and devotion or as they more interested in impressing the crowd about the worth of their dress and their crown.

Who march in these processions? The richest families in town. Is that what the Church has become? Why condemn the gays for wanting to join this farce. The Santacruzan stopped being one that honors Our Lady a long time ago. Unless it can evolve into a form that makes sense as a procession to Our Lady, it actually ought to be thrown into the garbage bin of history.

# # # #

hvp 05.07.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com