“(T)he rating of the Wowowee program started to decline from 22-23% under his watch to a single digit with different trial hosts.”
by Ducky Paredes
His pleading in Civil Case No. 10-67770 begins thus: “Plaintiff has, for valid reasons, rescinded his contract with ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp. However, ABS-CBN publicly disputed the rescission and claimed it was the aggrieved party. So the public may know the truth as to who really is the aggrieved party, who truly is at fault, who has been insincere, who acted with evident bad faith, and who broke promises, plaintiff desires to have his rescission judicially confirmed.”
In his complaint against defendant ABS-CBN, Willie Revillame claims that the network suspended him without pay, unilaterally cancelled his TV program Wowowee and downgraded his TV appearances from three hours daily or 18 hours weekly to just one hour weekly, or 17 hours less.
ABS-CBN also placed him on probation without assurance of reinstatement, and also downgraded his appearance from a “live” to a “pre-recorded” program, which constitutes censorship and prior restraint. His contract provides for a live telecast.
Revillame is also deprived of his earning from “in-show” product endorsements, which has become part of his compensation package.
What Willie wants to know is why the giant entertainment network is going out of its way to destroy him. Is it because of politics? He openly backed Manny Villar, a personal friend, while ABS-CBN campaigned for Noynoy Aquino.
Why else the “deliberate sabotage” of his image by the company by airing “destructive pieces” against him instead of promoting him as its talent?
He said there is also an “abuse of right by ABS-CBN under a one-sided contract of adhesion, purposely intended to destroy his career and to humiliate him, which is not in keeping with good faith, usage and law.”
Why did the giant network refuse to bring him back, even when the rating of the Wowowee program started to decline from 22-23% under his watch to a single digit with different trial hosts?
For Willie to continue working under terms that include probation, censorship and prior restraint, he feels that this would already constitute involuntary servitude.
Revilame’s contract with ABS-CBN ties him to the network until its expiration on September 11, 2011, despite the fact that ABS-CBN already rescinded the same when it unilaterally cancelled Wowowee. ABS-CBN even went so far as to threaten with lawsuits any network who would employ Revillame.
Thus, his one hope is that the courts will give him judicial relief by ruling that Willie has the right to break an unfair and illegal contract. After all, if the contract means that the network does not have to give you work but can prevent others from hiring you. Isn’t that a clear violation of one’s rights? Doesn’t such a contract – that can prevent one from working and earning — reduce one to the status of a slave that has to serve a master even if he gives you nothing. A man is reduced to not working and no pay just to please ABS-CBN until September 10, 2011?
Since ABS-CBN had unilaterally cancelled Wowowee , Revillame said “maghahanap-buhay naman ako para makapagbigay ligaya ako sa mga tao at sa aking mga fans.” He said that he is willing to forgo his claim for damages if he and ABS-CBN can go their separate ways amicably.
Revillame says that he devoted all his time to making Wowowee succeed but that management seemed to have disregarded this when they cancelled the program.
“For five years and-a-half buhay ko ang ibinigay ko dyan. Nine o’clock in the morning hanggang gabi, ideas ko ibinigay ko sa kanila. Bakit ganyan ang trato nila sa akin?”
The contract with ABS-CBN had a term of three years, commencing on September 11, 2008, and ending on September 10, 201l. In the nearly two years that Willie hosted the show, it moved to the top ranking of television shows, generating 22 to 23 percent of viewership. After he stopped hosting the show, viewership dropped to just nine percent, indicating that the public sorely missed Willie on their noonday TV.
Willie’s problems began when on complaining to the management about the incessant personal attacks made against him by broadcaster Jobert Sucaldito, also of ABS-CBN, his complaints were ignored. What was that all about? Why did Sucaldito launch a unilateral attack on Willie? Why did ABS-CBN allow it? Could politics have been the cause of all this?
* * *
On that hostage negotiation that turned bloody, the one lesson to be learned is that there should be only one man in charge who can restrict people’s movements and media coverage, have control over the police and the single negotiator. He should be in total control. The one goal should be to save all the hostages. Anything else – freedom of the press, arresting people, the rights of usiseros and families, etc. – should not interfere with that main purpose.
As it was, the live coverage of the arrest of the brother (who should have been prevented from going anywhere near the hostage-taker) set off the carnage. We should thank the negotiator for successfully saving the lives of those who were freed prior to the killing.
As to our police, they should go back to school to learn crowd control and how to arrest suspects without allowing them to make a scene. That arrest which started the carnage was very poor police work.
* * *
I received an e-mail with the picture of an old friend who has been away for some time now– Nitoy Escano, broadcaster, golfer and wise man.
It read simply: “Nestor Rafael Basa Escano, October 24, 1933 – August 16, 2010.”
It continues: “’What good is it for a man to gain the whole world yet forfeit his soul?’ Mark 8:36”
“Loving husband and father. He was a friend who sticks closer than a brother. He lived his life with great passion in accomplishing his goals.”
Good-bye, old friend. Prayers from devout readers are appreciated.
# # # #
hvp (08.25.10)
