Skip to content

Ang Laguna de Bay

Deretsahan

ni Horacio Paredes

Si Dr. Danilo Israel ay isang senior research fellow mg isang think-tank ng gobiyerno na Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS). Ayon sa kanya, magaling ang ginagawa ng Laguna Lake Development Authority (LLDA) at ng Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) sa pamamagitan ng Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Management Council (FARMC) nang kanilang pagtanggal ng 74 na illegal fish pen malapit sa Taguig at Muntinglupa. Mayroon pang 100 na illegal fishpen malapit sa Isla ng Talim na kanila pa ring bugungkagin. Tama lamang na gawin nila ito.

Tinuturing na labag sa batas ang mga ito dahil sa wala silang permit; ngunit mayroon ring 446 na fishpen na mayroong permiso ng Lake Management Division ng LLDA. Ayon kay Dr. Israel, tama ang ginagawa ng mga tagapamahala na kanilang gustong ayusin ang pamamalakad sa Laguna de Bay, ang pinakamalaking lawa sa Pilipinas at isa sa pinakamalaki sa buong ASEAN. Tama lamang na ayusin ang pag-gamit nito upang maging mas “environment friendly” ang pamamalakad ng lawa; ngunit, ayon sa kanya, hindi dapat na tanggalin na lamang ng pamahalaan ang lahat ng mga fishpen rito.

Ang ani mula sa mga baklad ng Laguna de Bay ay umaabot sa 56 porsiyento ng buong naaani mula sa lawa, kahit na ang baklad ay gumagamit ng anim na porsiyento lamang. Karamihan sa mga isdang lawa ay binebenta sa Rizal, Laguna at Metro Manila, malaking sector ng ating populasyon.

Ang mga baklad rin ay pinagkikitaan ng 5,000 na mamayan na nasa aquaculture business at libo pa rin ang mga nabubuhay sa paglalako ng fish fry fingerlings, pagkain ng isda, lambat, kawayan at kumikita bilang mga namamakyaw at nagtitingi ng isdang lawa. Kumikita rin ang pamahalaan sa mga baklad na mayroong permiso at sa mga income tax na binabayad ng mga nasa negosyo ng isda galing sa lawa.

Ayon kay Dr, Israel, hindi naman ang mga baklad ang pangunahing pinagggagalingan ng pagkalubha ng lawa. Ayon sa ilang pagsusuri, 40 porsiyento ng dumurumi sa lawa ng Laguna’y galing sa basura mula sa pagsasaka; 30 porsiyento naman ay galing sa mga factory at 30 porsiyento sa mga bahay sa gilid ng lawa.

Sumasangayon rito si LLDA General Manager Edgardo Manda. Ayon kay Manda, ang 68 na porsiyento ng basura na umaabot sa Laguna de Bay domestic waste at 19 porsiyento lamang ang industrial waste. 13 porsiyento lamang ang basurang galing sa mga baklad.

Ayon kay Manda: “The lake has become the largest septic tank for human and industrial wastes and the polluted river flushings have resulted to fish kills.”

Tanggap naman ni Dr. Israel at ni LLDA GM Manda na nakakadagdag rin naman ang mga baklad sa pagiging marumi ng Laguna de Bay. Ayon kay Dr. Israel: “We must determine the optimal level of aquaculture activity in the area.” Dapat na ipagpatuloy ang pagtanggal ng mga illegal at dapat na buksan ang lawa upang mas nakakaraan ang mga maliliit na mga banca.

Ngunit, huwag namang tanggalin ang lahat ng baklad! Ka-awa-awa naman ang mga mahihirap kung ito’y mangyari!

# # # #

hvp (07.16.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Hard Times Ahead

“(T)he Renewable Energy Law will add 1,250 megawatts and save us at least $1.2 billion in ten years!”

by Ducky Paredes

The reports coming from the world front is grim. Hurricanes, heat waves, wild fires, cyclones, floods, drought, melting ice caps, increased greenhouse gas emissions, rising sea levels, rising prices for everything, increasing holes in our ozone layer, the end of cheap oil and even the total depletion of oil production in 40 years.

In the recent Group of 8 meeting in Japan, the best that the leading nations of the world could agree on was that they would try to lower the level of harmful gas emissions and that they would cut by half carbon emissions by 2050, 42 years from now. By that time, the reports from the world front will be even worse.

One has to realize that the whole world is in a bind. In fact, it is we – the whole world — who are the cause of all our problems. We, in this country, cannot rely on allies, friends and the charity of the world, We must meet the challenges we face on our own.

I am reminded of the stories of our uncles and fathers (grandparents to the younger readers) of how we coped with World War II in the Philippines. We had trucks that ran on charcoal or alcohol and we walked to wherever we were going. We developed food such as castaniyog – squares of coconut meat roasted like chestnuts. We added extenders to rice – corn bits, kamote bits and so on.

I was a young child during the war and was just six when it was all over but I know that my world did not want for anything, especially the love and nurturing of family. Thus, I really do not know the extent of what we did as a people but we survived. One realizes that we were then a sturdy and inventive people.

We have to be that – again. America, Israel and the rest of the western world must realize that they can no longer be the big bullies on the world stage – that when they react to the world, especially in the Middle East and Africa in the way that they have always done, this only makes matters worse and, in a sense, brings doomsday closer to reality.

We find ourselves having to rely on ourselves with very little help from the rest of the world.

The plan of the government to become self-sufficient in rice in three years makes it worthwhile to spend all that money on the project. Let us hope that the money is actually spent on planting the Asian food staple, without which the Filipino cannot survive.

We have two pieces of legislation – the Biofuels Act and the Renewable Energy Bill passed by congress but still pending in the Senate which would decrease the use of fossil fuels like coal and oil by promoting the use of renewable energy and alternative fuels – biomass, solar, wind, hydro, geothermal and ocean energy. One might add that the use of hydrogen cells and even nuclear power to generate electricity ought to also be considered.

The National Power Corporation (Napocor) estimates that final enactment of the Renewable Energy Law will add 1,250 megawatts and save us at least $1.2 billion in ten years! After the US, we are the second largest geothermal energy producer in the world with 1,978 megawatts from the heat of our volcanic formations. Wind power is in use in North Luzon; biodiesel is in use and ethanol plants are under construction in our sugar areas even as we blend ethanol to our gasoline.

The Cagayan Electric Power Plant in Cagayan de Oro City has the biggest solar power plant in Southeast Asia. Natural gas from Malampaya is in use to power electric power plants and will soon be bottled as compressed natural gas (CNG) for household and automotive use. Many taxi firms have shifted to the cheaper Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG(, which incidentally has cleaner emissions than diesel or gasoline.

The larger enterprises – both private and government – are also pitching in. Napocor has been engaged in the management and conservation of most of the country’s watershed resources. These are essential for our hydroelectric plants to continue operating.

Napocor’s watershed management role assures us that our geothermal resources that contribute 28 percent of the country’s power supply and our hydroelectric power plants (23 percent) towards our total power requirements.

Mindanao is largely dependent on hydropower which is one reason for the lower electricity rate on the island.

Without proper management, our watershed could deteriorate. Rivers could silt up  cutting off hydro from its power source. In heavy rainfall, floods and mudflows could destroy towns and villages,

The proper management of these watershed areas not only maintains the water resources that feed into the dams, it also preserves wildlife and enhances the quality of the air.

The EPIRA Law sources the funds (from the environmental charge fund in our electricity bills) that finance the watershed management expenses of Napocor, which must be approved by the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC).

* * *

“Energy will be the immediate test of our ability to unite this Nation, and it can also be the standard around which we rally. On the battlefield of energy we can win for our Nation a new confidence, and we can seize control again of our common destiny. “ — Jimmy Carter, former President of the United States

* * *

We simply must balance our demand for energy with our rapidly shrinking resources. By acting now we can control our future instead of letting the future control us.” –  Jimmy Carter

* * *

“The use of plant oil as fuel may seem insignificant today. But such products can in time become just as important as kerosene and these coal-tar-products of today.” — Rudolf Diesel, inventor of the diesel engine, which originally ran on peanut oil.

* * *

“I’d put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don’t have to wait ’til oil and coal run out before we tackle that.” –  Thomas Edison (1847–1931)

# # # #

hvp 07.15.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Our Runaway Population

“Rep. Edcel Lagman has written  the Reproductive Health and Population Management Bill that is now being considered by Congress and which is opposed by the Church.”

by Ducky Paredes

A letter from a reader: “I enjoy reading your Malaya articles since you are the only one whose opinion is very objective, fair and balance unlike the other Malaya contributors. On the above subject, I totally agree with you - it looks like the Church, especially the puppets of Rome, have been abusing their privilege of being separated from the State. Here in the USA, any body or group (religious or what) that’s classified as tax-free entity will lose this privilege (tax-free) if they start meddling with the government affairs.

“I think if the Philippine government starts taking away their tax-free status when they meddle, I bet the church will keep its mouth shout. These group are now so powerful and rich and I start to wonder if the Philippine society is going back to the old Spanish friar-led days. It’s scary. Anyhow, just my two cents. Keep up the good work.” — Andy Viloria

* * *

The letter comes at a good time because the government is again trying to talk to the Catholic Church about population control.

The United Nations has population and reproductive health programs that have been adopted by 140 countries, including some from where we inherited our Catholic values such as Italy — where Rome and the Vatican are, Spain and Mexico, whose Spanish viceroy was managing the Philippines for Spain during the colonial times, and the United States.

These programs are not acceptable in other countries such as those run by the Taliban and similarly situated governments.

What does the UN population and reproductive Heath Initiative want to accomplish? For women all over the world to: plan their families and avoid unwanted pregnancies, undergo pregnancy and childbirth safely and avoid sexually transmitted infections. The UN program also wants to combat violence against women and promote the equality of women.

The main goals of the UN Program of Action are: Universal access to reproductive health services by 2015; Universal primary education and closing the gender gap in education by 2015; Reducing maternal mortality by seventy-five percent by 2015; Reducing infant mortality; and Increasing life expectancy.

This is also what a lot of us want to happen in our country. We are unable to move forward, however, because the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) is just dead-set against any population and reproductive health initiative.

Rep. Edcel Lagman has written  the Reproductive Health and Population Management Bill that is now being considered by Congress and which is opposed by the Church.  Lagman has  proposed a Legislators-Bishops Dialogue to Malacanang, with the idea that if the President and CBCP meet with the legislators sponsoring the bill in Congress, they might have a fruitful discussion and dialogue about the specific provisions of the bill,

While a lot of other countries have adopted their own reproductive health and population management policies, in the Philippines, we cannot get moving because the Church takes the medieval position that contraceptives and condoms are products from Hell.

Thus, the 2006 Family Planning Survey (FPS) of the National Statistics Office reveals that 10 Filipina women die every 24 hours from causes related to pregnancy and childbirth. High incidence of high-risk births, inadequate prenatal care, and lack of information and means to manage complications in difficult pregnancies account for much of the increased risks of dying during pregnancy and childbirth. 

The 2006 FPS also showed that the actual total fertility rate (TFR) of 3.2 is higher than the desired fertility rate of 2.5.  The TFR is higher among women from the poor sector where they have three times more children than the rich. Despite the high unmet need among the poor, contraceptive use is still lower among the poor women with 47.3% Contraceptive Prevalence Rate versus the 52.4% among the non-poor.

Thus, the poor are the real victims of the Church’s medieval mind-set while the more well-to-do generally ignore what their Bishops say.

 The current policy of the national government is not to take a stand and instead it has adopted population control methods approved by the CBCP which (sadly) do not work!

With the current crisis on food and the continuous worsening of poverty in the country, I believe  that it is urgent that the President include the passage of a national policy on population and reproductive health among her legislative  priorities. But, of course, she will not since she styles herself as being a good daughter of the Church. When she was still of child-bearing age, however, this President confesses that she did use contraceptives to control her own contributions to the country’s population.

* * *

My own take on this is that our high population growth rates only make our already poor even poorer. We have children in this country who do not have enough to eat and who cannot have an education. Even if they did, with the lack of nutrients in their diet during their formative years, many of these children have very little hope for learning much since their poor diet has already affected the development of their brains.

Is it wrong to try to control our population? Is what the Bishops are telling us really what God wants for us — high population rates that challenge our country’s economic capacity to provide for her population?

Why would our God specifically want us Pinoys to suffer?

* * *

The Third Leg of the six-leg San Mig Senior Tournament of the Federation of Philippine Amateur Senior Golfers, Inc. (FPASGI) will be on Friday, July 18, 2008 at Intramuros Golf Club. Tee-off will be sequential beginning at 6:30 up to 9 in the morning.

Tournament fee (only FPASGI members can join) is P1,500 which includes everything – Green Fee, Caddy Fee, Mandatory Mulligan, Lunch, Giveaways and Raffle Prizes.

Intramuros is not an easy course. It may be shorter than regular courses but the number of hazards that one has to avoid makes it as much as a challenge as other, much longer courses.

# # # #

hvp 07.14.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Huwag Naman Sana; Maawa Naman Kayo!

Deretsahan

ni Horacio Paredes

 

Sa pagtalaga ng isang Tuta ni Gloria na si Romulo Neri, bilang Chairman ng Social Security System at tagapamahala ng “National Social Welfare Program,” huwag sanang isipin ng Malakanyang at ni Gloria Arroyo na papayag na lamang ang lahat – pati na ang mga kawani ng SSS at ng Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) at ang mga OFW na nagpalaki ng mga pondong hawak ng POEA at iba pang mga ahensiyang malalaking kwartang hawak ng Pag-Ibig na maaari nilang iwaldas ang kwartang ito na nanggaling sa hirap at pawis ng mga manggagawang Pilipino dito at sa mga ibang bansa.

Nadinig ko na sa radyo na sinasabi ni Sergio Apostol ang Legal Counsel ni Gloria Arroyo na alinsunod sa ating mga batas, maaaring kumuha ng pondo ang Malacanang sa mga pondong ito na pag-aari ng mga manggagawa upang ipamudmod sa mga mahihirap na nangangailangan ng tulong.

Hindi maaaring tama ang sinabi ni Apostol. Bakit naman bibigyan ng karapatan ang isang kahit na sino na maaari nilang kunin ang pondo na kontribusyon ng mga manggagawa para na rin sa kanilang retirement at iba pang pangangailangan.

Hindi tama na pakialaman ng kahit na Presidente ng Pilipinas ang mga trust fund na ito dahil nakatabi ang mga kwartang ito para sa pangangailangan ng mismong mga manggagawa.

Bakit naman sila maglalaan ng kwarta kada buwan sa SSS o GSIS o sa POEA o Pag-Ibig Fund, kung maaari naman palang kunin ang lahat ng isang Presidente upang gamitin sa kung saan niya gustong gamitin?

* * *

Mayroong isang empleyado sa City Hall ng isang lunsod na malapit sa Metro Manila na mayroong tinanong sa akin. Hindi ko masagot. Ayon sa taong hindi na muna nating pangangalanan, siya raw ay isang driver ng City Hall. Pitong taon na raw siya sa kaniyang pwesto at anim na taon na siyang miyembro ng GSIS. Noong nahalal raw ang kasalukuyang alkalde, nagbago ang patakaran.

Simula noong umupo ito’y ang mga fiver at messenger at iba pang mga empleyado ay tinaggal bilang government employee. Sila naman ay tinaggap ng isang ahensiya na binigyan ng kontrata ng city hall upang kumuha ng mga driver, messenger at iba pa bilang empleyado ng ahensiya na kanilang nilalagay sa city hall. Sa magdaling salita, hindi na sila government employee kundi contractual employee ng isang pribadong ahensiya.

Nawala na ang anim na taon niyang kontribusyon sa GSIS at sinimulan naman siya bilang miyembro ng SSS. Nanghihinayang siya sa anim na taong kontribusyon niya sa GSIS at ang kaniyang mga benepisyong nawala noong siya’y kusang tinanggal sa payroll ng gobiyerno’t sapilitang pinasok sa isang ahensiya na may kontrata sa city hall.

Sa totoo lamang, hindi ko alam na maaari palang gawin ang ganito. Akala ko ang SM lamang ang kumukuha ng mga contractual upang makatipid sa mga benepisyo, retirement at iba pang dapat nilang binibigay sa kanilang mga empleyado’ Yoon pala’y pati pala ang gobiyerno’y pinagsasamantalahan rin ang mga empleyado nila.

# # # #

hvp (07.14.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Finally, CTPL That Works

“From that time to the present, the GSIS has properly and efficiently done its job of covering all government vehicles.”

by Ducky Paredes

The government has finally done what it should have done a long time ago. All vehicles on the road will now be covered with compulsory third party liability insurance (CTPL) that will actually pay accident victims and will not victimize the private vehicle owner.

Compulsory TPL insurance started with President Ferdinand Marcos’ Letter of Instruction 191 which created the Philippine Motor Vehicle Liability Pool. This made compulsory TPL vehicle insurance for all vehicles — a consortium of private insurance companies together with the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS). The consortium, managed by representatives of the insurance industry, eventually collapsed because of various fraudulent practices coming from the side of member companies as well as the management group.

         Thus, P.D. Nos. 1455 and 1814 were issued.  The CTPL was transferred to the GSIS for government vehicles, and to the private insurance companies for private vehicles.

         From that time to the present, the GSIS has properly and efficiently done its job of covering all government vehicles.

         CTPL coverage for the private sector, however, was not handled as well or as efficiently. Private sector coverage suffered from the problem of fake insurance policies and fake certificates of cover and the practice of unauthorized franchising. These illegal practices prejudiced the insuring public with premiums being absconded, taxes due government not remitted and the non-payment of claims that should have been paid to motor vehicle accident victims.

Not only that, the premiums paid by private vehicle owners was also much higher than the premiums for the policies issued by the GSIS!

In 2002, in response to the growing concern over the proliferation of fake policies and certificates of cover (COCs), the LTO agreed to implement the private insurance companies sponsored COC Authentication System (COCAS), requiring the authentication of COCs thru D-Tech, a company chosen by the private insurance  industry instead of STRADCOM, the IT contractor of LTO.

The COCAS, however, still failed to solve the problem: the fakes were still there,  premiums were still absconded, taxes were unremitted to government, and claims of the registering/ insuring public remain unpaid.

         In 2005, upon invitation by DOTC/LTO-STRADCOM/DOF, GSIS, PIRA and RAMSI submitted to the DOTC-LTO-STRADCOM Interconnectivity Committee   proposals to address the recurring fraudulent practices related to the CTPL in the private insurance industry circles.

GSIS proposed integration of the CTPL insurance in the vehicle registration process.

In 2006, a CTPL committee formed by DOF-DOTC with the IC and DOTC Undersecretary for land transportation as co-chair, with the heads of LTO, LTFRB and DOF as members, invited interested parties to submit solutions to the CTPL problem. Among the submitted proposals were IC/PIRA proposal for the creation of a clearing house and the collection/sale of CTPL insurance through selected banks Private companies were made to contribute P200,000.00 thousand each.

GSIS reiterated its 2005 proposal to integrate insurance and registration at the LTO System.

In July 2007, DOTC issued a Department Order

for the integration of insurance and registration using the LTO System after the Department of Justice issued separate opinions stating that DOTC LTO had the legal mandate to implement said program and that GSIS  had legal mandate as well to underwrite the CTPL insurance even for private vehicles. This was opposed by the private insurance industry through a court case filed by PIRA.

         Also in July 2007, due to the expiration of the MOA of D-Tech for the authentication of COCs, the DOTC-LTO implemented an interim system for issued CTPL insurance policies using STRADCOM’s on-line authentication system linked to the LTO database.

         In January 2008, PIRA passed a resolution advising its members that they find nothing objectionable to the proposal of some members to pass on the cost of the interconnectivity fee, that is being charged by STRADCOM, in the verification of COCs to their clients-assureds in the amount of P50.40 inclusive of 12% VAT per COC, although PIRA in a prior transport summit meeting of DOTC-LTO-LTFRB-Transport sector committed to absorb the P50.40 IT fee.

         In the meantime, LTFRB reported to LTO  that the interim verification system led to another private insurance industry anomalous practice among some private insurers of misdeclaring vehicles types and issuing inappropriate policies. You might have thought that you were insuring against TPL your four-door sedan when the issued policy actually covered a tricycle!

         On June 30, 2008 the LTO sent a memorandum to DOTC that with the Insurance Commission’s (IC) adoption of the GSIS proposal to integrate insurance and registration at the LTO registration process thru its IT database. With the IC’s concurrence, a memorandum of agreement to implement the GSIS solution was signed. The PIRA injunction against the adoption of the GSIS solution was dismissed by RTC Makati Branch 45 on 23 June 2008,

On July 1, 2008  MOA was signed by DOTC-LTO-IC-GSIS and STRADCOM to implement a permanent solution to more than three (3) decades old problem of CTPL insurance via integration of insurance and registration at LTO registration process.

* * *

Vehicle owners will surely welcome the implementation of the GSIS CTPL scheme because it saves them money and ensures that their CTPLs are genuine.

A private vehicle owner will now only pay P575 for the GSIS CTPL compared to the P900 charged by present CTPL providers, for a saving of P325 per policy. The GSIS CTPL for utility vehicles, including jeepneys, will also cost only P575 compared to its old price of P950, for a saving of P375.

Light truck owners, on the other hand, will pay P355 less with the GSIS CTPL for that vehicle category costing only P625 per policy, compared to its erstwhile P980 price. Motorcycle owners will save P85 per GSIS CTPL policy costing P265 as against the old CTPL cost of P350.

While the GSIS will oversee the new CTPL system, it will farm out the actual provision of CTPL policies to creditable reinsurers, thereby rendering without basis claims that the GSIS will monopolize the CTPL business.

The purchase of GSIS CTPLs by motorists will be automatic and included already in the registration process of the LTO. This is not so in the present system under which motorists have to buy first CTPLs with private dealers before transacting with the LTO.

Just how serious was this problem?  From 2000 to 2007, 39.7 million vehicles were registered with the LTO, but only 17.1 million valid CTPLs were on record to have been issued for the period. The 22.6 million difference is the number of fake CTPLs sold in the seven-year period. Two out of three buyers of CTPLs bought worthless insurance coverage.

Meanwhile, estimates put the losses of the government from the CTPL racket at P2 billion for the period.

* * *

Point of clarification: CTPL covers injuries to a third party. In insurance parlance, the insurer is the first party and you, the insured, are the second party. Thus, those who are covered are people injured in accidents – both your vehicle’s passengers and the other vehicle’s passengers. Pedestrians are also third party.

# # # #

hvp 07.13.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

The Wall between Church and State

“Is there Catholic Church dogma that declares Nuclear Power as evil?”

by Ducky Paredes 

I do not understand the government’s position on current things economic. Why should its economic managers be ordered to speak to the Catholic bishops before doing anything with the value added tax?

There is wisdom in Article 1, Section 6 of our Constitution which says: “The separation of Church and State shall be inviolable.” The inherent  wisdom in that is the foreknowledge that most churchmen really know very little about running a government or the importance of state affairs. Besides, why target the bishops for where to get your advice when what is needed are not matters spiritual but the very banal stuff such as where to get the money for what projects or charitable works government has to engage in so that we can all survive the tough times without too much suffering.

One would think that the better ones from whom to seek counsel would be the business sector rather than the religious.

Besides, by consulting the bishops, it gives them a sense of power such that Bishop Socrates Villegas finds it in himself to warn the government against opening the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (BNPP).

Is there Catholic Church dogma that declares Nuclear Power as evil? From the arguments put fotrth by Bishop Villegas, it would seem that to him, the BNPP sis a monument to the aspiration of the Marcos government and is the symbol of its corruption.

To my mind, the BNPP is a fully-paid for asset of the government, To not use it for anything must be a sin to a government of a very poor country such as the Philippines. That this never produced one watt of power even if it was, at one time capable of lighting up all of Metro Manila has to be the least blessed act of the past government.

We paid through the nose for this and never used it; now, we are being warned against using it because it si some kind of a symbol for evil? Quick, someone bless the BNPP to drive away its evil look and the demo ns that must reside in that building!

Thomas Jefferson said about the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution: “”Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should ‘make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,’ thus building a wall of separation between Church & State.”

To my mind, the wall that separates the Church from the State should be made stronger and maybe higher so that going over it to visit the other side will be well nigh impossible.

* * *

We have a reaction from a reader on yesterday’s column: “Tanong lang: Paano na-satisfy ang  “BDO will immediately execute the sale documents ” kung wala pala sa araw at lugar na yoon ang principal signatory of the sale (i.e., BDO President)?  Ano pangako’t bunganga’t, laway, tapos dumating ang P176M?

“Bakit hindi kaliwaan ang usapan sa mga ganyan corporate deals?  Mauuna ba ang bayad (cleared funds) saka na lang hihintayin ang (mga) signed documents?  Hindi ba tulad din yan sa bilihan ng droga sa kanto, mayroong  ‘honor system’.  Iyabot mo ang pera sabay abot ng produkto?  Malinis. Thence, bahala ka na sa buhay mo!

“What puzzles me to find ay ang mga brilliant na mga tao na ito (pala) ay nalilinlang ba din?  Akala hindi, akala ko mga squatters lang ang naloloko.

“Salamat, may natutuhan ako sa sinulat mo.” – Lito Dionisio Santos

* * *

I do not really blame the original shareholders who were matching the offer of Antonio Go for allowing themselves to be fooled. Clearly, BDO went into the deal – talking to them and setting up an almost impossible condition for the delivery of their money — with the idea of frustrating them. BDO clearly wanted Antonio Go to get Maxicare and is continuing to do everything in its power to give Maxicare to him,

They may be brilliant persons but when someone is out to gyp you, the gypper can usually still pull it off because you really do not expect that the respectable persons you speak with at BDO –the President and the chairperson (eldest daughter of Henry Sy) — would pull off a cheap scam such as they did.

In fact, the Assistant Board Secretary of Maxicare under instructions from the Maxicare Board (all BDO appointees) made a sworn statement to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that the Stockholders’ Book was lost. He then asked for a new one and entered there the sale to Antonio Go. This was negated when former Ateneo Law Dean Eduardo de los Angeles, the Corporate Secretary went to the SEC to present the original record book.

Is Antonio Go now the owner of 60% of Maxicare? According to the original shareholders agreement, it is only the Singapore Arbitration Court that can decide on this. Thus, while for now Antonio Go is considered the owner by BDO and the BDO-appointed board of Maxicare, I see that there will still be a lot of lawsuits coming out of this foolishness that BDO pointlessly entered into. After all, if it wanted to get out of its non-core business, why did BDO immerse itself in shenanigans that will find BDO embroiled  in litigation over the next few years. Is litigation a core business for BDO?

* * *

Oops! Errors in yesterday’s column “Haw Siaw at BDO”: Cigna and PCIB bought into Maxicare  in 1998, not 1988, which was also when the stockholders agreement was signed. Cigna subsequently sold its 30% to Equitable. When Equitable merged with PCIB, Equitable-PCIBank became the 60% owner.

When BDO merged with Equitable-PCIBank, BDO became the owner of 60% of Maxicare shares.

# # # #

hvp 07.11.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Haw Shiaw at BDO

“When Cigna came in. it insisted on a change in the Maxicare by-laws which bound all of the present stockholders to give the ‘right of first refusal’ to the other shareholders if and when they sold their shares.”

by Ducky Paredes

 

According to its internet website, “Maxicare Healthcare Corporation was born in 1987 with the noble mission to provide customers peace of mind through superior core company, we serve the country’s top corporations, with 300,000 membership population nationwide, through a comprehensive Healthcare Provider Network across the land.
”

The shareholders of Maxicare were Felicito Payumo, Benjamin Santos, Jose R. San Gabriel, Gertrude L Mirasol, Jose P. Caedo, Vicente D. Arguelles, Francisco C. Pascual, Godofredo B. Banzon, Chester C. Babst, Peter Sen, Raul Concepcion, Fefrico Leelin, Roberto K. Macasaet, Medical Doctors, Inc, and Eduardo de los Angeles, who was also Corporate Secretary.

In 1988, PCIBank and Cigna, a US-based HMO, bought into the company. Each purchased 60,000 shares representing 30% of the stocks. Thus, the two big companies – the bank and the American HMO – owned 60% of Maxicare.

When Cigna came in. it insisted on a change in the Maxicare by-laws which bound all of the present stockholders to give the “right of first refusal” to the other shareholders if and when they sold their shares.

Of course, we all know that PCIBank was merged with Equitable which was later merged with Banco de Oro (BDO) , which is principally owned by the family of Henry Sy, the mall magnate. Cigna decided to sell its shares and BDO bought them. Thus, BDO controlled 60% of Maxicare and appointed the members of the board as well as controlling everything else that Maxicare did.

Last year, BDO informed Maxicare that it wanted to get out of the HMO business to concentrate on its core business and was, thus, selling its shares – all of the 60% — to Antonio Go who was then given one share of the 120,000 shares held by BDO so that he could be elected to the board.

Maxicare, as a company, waived its rights to buy the BDO shares but the original shareholders still had 90 days to exercise their individual rights to match the offer of Antonio Go, if they cared to do so.

Benjamin Santos, former insurance commissioner, Eduardo de los Angeles, former law dean of the Ateneo Law School and former Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) Chairman and Felicito Payumo, former head of the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA) decided to look at their company. They saw possibilities in Maxicare that they did not see before. For instance, the company had larger gross sales than competing HMOs but lesser profits. Clearly, the business could be made more profitable.

They, thus, pooled their resources together and on December 5, 2007, as Payumo tells it, “we saw Atty. Erlaster Sotto of BDO in his office, who advised us collectively, in a letter dated December 5, 2007 that BDO will ‘immediately execute’ the sale documents covering the offered shares provided that ‘BDO receives the payment of P176 million in case or cleared funds at its BDO Savings Account no. 1463-467 16-8 with BDO EPCI Tower 1 branch (463) in Makati Avenue corner H. V. de la Costa Street, Makati City, on or before 5:00 p.m. on December 5,2007.

“Anyone of us three who would fail to comply with the said payment terms would be charged 10% penalty.”

One supposes that the BDO lawyer did not expect that the three – Payumo, de los Angeles and Santos – could do what he was asking. It was well nigh impossible. After all, how many armored trucks would be needed to transport P176,000,000 in cash to the BDO branch in time to be counted and deposited before the end of the banking day?

But, Payumo, Santos and de los Angeles pulled it off. They were able to place “cleared funds” into the BDO account before the close of business hours of the same day.

Says Payumo “BDO acknowledged receipt of payment and Mr. Sotto expressed relief that, finally, this transaction would be over as it has caused him so much stress.”

But, the story was not over. A few days later, they were told that the appointed signatory to the sale, BDO President Nestor Tan was abroad and would not be back for two days. Then, when, 10 days later, still no document arrived, the Pinoys wrote the Chinese bank demanding for the documents. The answer they got was that the BDO board’s authority to the BDO President was to execute the document of sale to Antonio Go, not to anyone else. Thus, they had to wait for the next BDO board meeting.

The next day, December 11, they were informed by BDO that the Maxicare Board (all appointees of BDO) requested that the three of them be disqualified from buying Maxicare and that this had to, therefore, be referred to the BDO legal department. They were also taken off the board of Maxicare besides being declared as disqualified buyers of the company that they founded decades before!

In the end, contrary to law, business practice and everything ethical, BDO. The Chinese bank, sold Maxicare to their fellow Chinese Antonio Go.

Of course, this is not the end of the story. Clearly, the Chinese buyer and seller connived to deprive the Pinoys of their “right of first refusal.” Under the original Cigna amendment to the corporate by-laws of Maxicare, any disputes must be settled in a Singapore Arbitration Court. This is where Payumo, Santos and de los Angeles have gone since even getting a TRO in the Philippines proved useless against such an entrenched and powerful family as the Henry Sys. The Makati judge refused to issue a TRO and ruled, instead, that Antonio Go had legally and permanently purchased the shares held by BDO. A Pinoy cannot even get justice in a Philippine court.

Perhaps, the Pinoys will do better in Singapore!

* * *

The Third Leg of the six-leg San Mig Senior Tournament of the Federation of Philippine Amateur Senior Golfers, Inc. (FPASGI) will be on Friday, July 18, 2008 at Intramuros Golf Club. Tee-off will be sequential beginning at 6:30 up to 9 in the morning.

Tournament fee (only FPASGI members can join) is P1,500 which includes everything – Green Fee, Caddy Fee, Mandatory Mulligan, Lunch, Giveaways and Raffle Prizes.

Intramuros is not an easy course. It may be shorter than regular courses but the number of hazards that one has to avoid makes it as much as a challenge as other, much longer courses.

# # # #

hvp 07.10.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Tulong Barya sa Eskwela

“(F)inancial and economic literacy is provided to public elementary teachers. It integrates the concept of ‘savings’ in the DepEd’s elementary education curriculum.”

 

by Ducky Paredes

 

The Department of Education (DepEd) in cooperation with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) has embarked on what it calls “a financial literacy program” to help teachers and students appreciate the value of even small amounts of money, particularly coins.

The project entitled ‘Tulong Barya Para Sa Eskwela’ project (TBPSE) was first launched in July 2007.  Because of the encouraging results, DepEd Secretary Jesli Lapus (one of the few admirable performing members of the Arroyo cabinet) continued the program this school year. “It’s only appropriate that our schools observe the habit of giving value to low-denomination coins,” Lapus said.

The TBPSE is a joint coin re-circulation campaign of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) and DepEd in line with its Adopt-A-School program where various entities both government and private sector provide support for basic education.

Lapus said during the initial implementation of the project last year, with the support of the Rural Bankers Association of the Philippines (RBAP) where rural banks tied up with local schools in their area, a total amount of P6,658,548.55 was generated.

The participating schools raised P2,747,116.94. Owing to the amount of coins collected, the BSP saved P8.2 million from not having to mint new coins.                  The BSP in turn donated the P8.2 million savings to DepEd in the form of 510 units of computer units distributed in different provinces.

The financial literacy project aims to increase savings especially among “small” savers, which include public school teachers and students. Under the literacy project, financial and economic literacy is provided to public elementary teachers. It integrates the concept of “savings” in the DepEd’s elementary education curriculum.

The BSP and DepEd are joined by the Economic Policy Reform and Advocacy (EPRA) to develop teaching guides and teachers training.

EPRA is a consortium led by the Ateneo de Manila University (ADMU) and composed of civil society organizations that aim to undertake an involved but practical process of formulating an economic reform agenda in the Philippines.

EPRA’s reform agenda in the key sectors of Fiscal Management, Tax Administration, Agriculture, Finance Markets Development, Private Investments in Public infrastructure and Local Government Financial Planning and Management is grounded on sound analyses by policy experts. More importantly, this reform agenda is also owned, and therefore widely supported, by key stakeholders.

EPRA realizes that economic policy reform in the Philippines requires a complex mix of research, networking, advocacy, political will and capacity building among various stakeholders. It is also aware that certain proposals for economic reform fail to be translated into policy because the proponents did not take into consideration the negative reaction of key affected groups. Worse, much resources are used by various groups just to oppose each other in the policy process leading to further bottlenecks in the promotion of the economic growth. Sometimes too, opposition of certain policy initiatives is the result of a lack of information or understanding of the issue at hand.

It is because of these constraints that EPRA wishes to mediate, to narrow the gap that oftentimes derails economic reform in the country. With the expertise and objectivity of the Ateneo de Manila University as an academic institution and the rich experience of civil society groups, EPRA can offer possible venues for dialogue and negotiations.

 Moreover, EPRA’s pool of experts and wide network of government, business and civil society organizations, ascertains that it can successfully formulate a sound overall framework and strategy in select key areas for economic reform in the country.

The ADMU Consortium is composed of: Ateneo School of Economics, Ateneo Center for Economic Research and Development (ACERD), Ateneo Center for Social Policy and Public Affairs, Philippine Center for Policy Studies (PCPS). Public Finance Institute of the Philippines (PFIP),Caucus of development NGOs (CODE-NGO), Consortium of Centers for Local Governance (CCLG), Evelio B. Javier Foundation, Inc., Galing Pook Foundation (GPFI), Transparency and Accountability Network

* * *

Here’s a bit of good news: Some of our best minds among the country’s recent graduates are dedicating their lives to teaching in the public school system. Recently, Jerome Patungan, Auralyn Baliton, Chona Nisperos, Ma. Theresa Nolledo and Jie Ann Bandong decided to go into teaching for DepEd. Jerome is magna cum laude, while the four young ladies are all cum laude graduates of Bachelor of Science in Education (BSE) from Pangasinan State University (PSU).

 These five exemplary alumni recently paid a courtesy call on Secretary Lapus with the sole purpose of expressing their desire to teach in public schools. At a time when the widespread migration of teachers to foreign shores threatens the ranks of our teaching force, Secretary Jesli Lapus was inspired to realize that these young beacons of hope.

 “I want to teach in a public school as a sense of duty to my country rather than go abroad,” said Baliton. For her part, Nolledo said that she  looks forward to teaching in a public school “because DepEd is taking good care of teachers.” Besides, “I want to have a part in molding our young into becoming good citizens.”

While Mr. Patungan, Ms. Baliton, Ms. Nisperos, Ms. Nolledo and Ms. Bandong serve as models to other students (and the rest of the Filipino population) because of their desire to give back to the country, the teachers of these young people, and ultimately the DepEd, also deserve recognition for molding them into citizens who TRULY care for their country.

A registrar in a private school, sometime ago, told me she had a one-page survey that asked the new enrollee loved. Philippines was coming out on the tail end of a list that included items such as Family, Friends, School, Gimmick and so on. When asked why the apparent lack of love for the country, the often shocking answer was that the child did not think that this country loved them. Could that be one reason for the brain drain?

# # # #

hvp 07.09.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

Ang Martsa sa NFA General Trias

Deretsahan

ni Horacio Paredes

Sobra sa isang libong nga manggagawa at mga mahihirap ang nag-martsa mula sa iba’t-ibang bayan ng lalawigan ng Cavite patungo sa mga panlalawigang warehouse ng National Food Authority (NFA) kung saan sila’y nag-picket.

Ang kanilang hiling: na panatiliin ang sapat na bigas para sa kanilang komunidad at isang mas mabuting sistema sa pag lako ng bigas. Umabot ng matagal na panahon ang picket sa Pasong Kawayan sa bayan ng General Trias bago nakipagusap ang mga kawani ng  NFA at nabuo ang  isang kasunduan na gagamitin ang mas maraming people’s organizations to be involved sa distribution scheme ng NFA.

Ang mga nag-picket ay ang Partidong Manggagawa, Samahang Nagkakaisa ng Cavite (SANAGCA), Alyansa ng Maralitang Pilipino (AMP), United Cavite Workers Association (UCWA) at Zone One Tondo Organization (ZOTO). Ang karamihan ng mga nag-martsa ay galing sa mga bayan ng Rosario, Tanza, Cavite City, General Trias at Dasmarinas.

Ayon kay Ramil Cangayao, council member of AMP, “This is not the usual protest action that is all about shouting slogans but without palpable results. Instead we aim to pressure the NFA for concrete action that will ease the hunger of the workers and the poor. We call on our fellow Filipinos to action. If we want our daily bread then we must fight militantly instead of accepting injustice.”

Ang isang nireklamo ng mga manggagawa ay ang hindi makataong sistemang ginagawa. Madalas na nauubusan ng bigas ang mga matagal nang haghihintay. Ang mga nakapila’y nakatindig kung saan wala man lamang masilungan at nakabilad ang mga ito sa mga elemento. Walang ibang linya ng hintayan na para sana sa mga buntis, matatanda at ang mga mayroong kapansanan. Lao na, ang bigas ay walang siguro kung darating nga ba sa pinaghihintayan nila.

Ayon kay Renato Magtubo, national chairperson ng PM, asserted: “The hunger and poverty of the masses is the real state of the nation and not the lies that will be GMA’s speech at the coming SONA. As we demand for immediate relief from the economic crisis, we call for a reversal of liberalization, deregulation, privatization, cheap labor, labor contractualization and other pro-globalization policies.”

Mukhang pangmatagalan na ang sistemang ito ng pagbebenta ng bigas sa ating lahat. Kahit na maaari nating purihin ang pamahalaan na, kahit naman papaano’y nabantayan nila ang pagtaas ng presyo sa world market, ngayon naman ang dapat nilang ayusin ay ang mas maka-tao at mas maayos na sistema ng pamumudmod ng bigas sa mga naghihirap ng sambayanan. Kahit na mayroon ngang bigas kung para namang iniinsulto ang iyong pagkatao’y wala ring dating ang sistema, di ba?

Ang maganda naman ay ang nakipagusap at nakipagsundo ang mga kawani ng NFA sa Cavite.

# # # #

hvp (07.09.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com

A Cozy Relationship

“(W)henever Albano has to explain ERC’s workings, it is always Meralco that he seems to be protecting.

by Ducky Paredes

 

If my old friend Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) Chairman Rodolfo Albano had asked my advice, I would have advised him to prepare carefully his explanations about what is happening to our power sector because the way that he usually sounds when he does so, he comes off looking like a spokesman for the Manila Electric Company (Meralco).

Poor Rudy! Perhaps, it is because Meralco is the biggest power distributor (with the highest costs compared to other smaller distributors in the country) and whenever Albano has to explain ERC’s workings, it is always Meralco that he seems to be protecting. This is specially true when media’s questions are accusatory as when the questions start off “Why did the ERC allow Meralco” to have this or that privilege or favor.

 Somehow, one gets the impression that both Albano and Meralco are looking at the power sector with the same eyes. Both are looking at the industry with the same perspective – Meralco’s!  This is dismaying to those who hear Rudy because their idea of a good, working ERC Chairman is one, who by his mandate will go out of his way to protect the consumer from the power distributor, It does not help the ERC and the government when the ERC Chairman seems to be chummy, if not in cahoots with the greedy power distributor.

The public perception of the ERC and its chairman is that they have done absolutely nothing to enforce the provisions of the Epira and Meralco’s own franchise for the company to provide its captive market electricity at the least cost to the consumers.

Meralco charges its customers two to three pesos more per kilowatt hour compared to what other distributors charge. This has been going on for so long now that one wonders why the ERC seems not to notice that Meralco is purchasing more expensive power from Lopez-owned power producers.

The ERC has also made a travesty of a Supreme Court order for the customers of Meralco to be refunded the P30 billion with which Meralco padded our electric bills with from 1994 to 2002.

The ER allowed Meralco to stagger the refund through the years. The ERC may also have betrayed consumers who have yet to be paid the refund by not minding Meralco’s delaying tactics and the many requirements it has been asking us its customers before the refund is given.

These and other delaying tactics of Meralco have been legitimized by the ERC under Albano and even by the Energy Regulatory Board (ERB) in the past.

The Supreme Court again had to come to the rescue of Meralco customers when it disallowed a provisional power rate increase effected through the ERC   by Meralco in 2004. The SC put its foot on the increase and ordered a refund of the same to customers after discovering that Meralco and the ERC short-circuited the process by which such an increase can be justified.

Without the benefit of public hearings and publication of the rate increase, ERC approved Meralco’s petition for a provisional rate increase. Providentially, a consumers’ group blew the whistle on the shenanigans of the ERC and Meralco before the SC.

 There’s still another SC ruling being put aside by the ERC and Albano. The SC ordered that the financial books of Meralco be audited by COA upon the recommendation of ERC.

 The National Association of Electricity Consumers for Reforms (Nasecore) brought this irregularity to public attention after being given the runaround by Albano and COA when it asked whatever happened to the 2006 SC order.

 According to Nasecore president Pete Ilagan, COA blamed ERC for not making an official request for COA to audit Meralco. Question now is why can’t Albano make a simple request to COA to comply with the SC order.

The litany of complaints against Albano and the ERC concerning their kid-glove, treatment of Meralco are legion.

There are the P21.4 billion meter and bill customer deposits the refund for which the ERC sat on for four long years by not issuing a guidelines on its collection. When Albano finally came up with the guidelines last month, it looked like something that came out of the Meralco Board. Albano gave Meralco five years to refund the P21.4 billion.

The good news for Rudy Albano is that he will soon be out of the ERC since his term is just about over. Would he have been better off extending the Mediterranean cruise he was on just the before the cozy relationship between ERC and Meralco surfaced?

* * *

Environment Secretary Jose Atienza, Jr. is talking a lot of sense when he wants to look at a solution to Metro Manila’s garbage disposal problem by going the route of  Singapore’s Pulau Semaku floating landfill.

Atienza saw this when he attended the Water Leaders’ Summit and addressed the Southeast Asia Business Forum.

Pulau Semaku Off-Shore Sanitary Landfill is a reclaimed 350-hectare island, was opened in 1999 and is capable of carrying 63 million cubic meters of waste. It will serve as Singapore’s main disposal facility even beyond 2045.

It is also an eco-tourism destination for fishing, bird watching, biodiversity, stargazing, mangrove development and educational and recreational outing. First, Singapore incinerates its wastes; then the ash is dumped on the floating landfill.

Atienza says: “An island sanitary landfill for Metro Manila may be doable if we can bring the cost down and secure appropriate engineering interventions to address the effects of typhoons. The technology for preventing seepage of leachate to the sea and the ground appears to be working in the Semaku landfill.”

The  Philippines still has 713 open dumpsites in blatant violation of the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act (RA 9003).

# # # #

hvp 07.08.08)

Readers who missed a column can access www.duckyparedes.com/blogs. This is updated daily. Your reactions are welcome at duckyparedes@yahoo.com